Partnering Students in Practical Research

Authors

  • Susan Oakley Gender Studies & Social Analysis, University of Adelaide
  • Dee Michell Gender Studies & Social Analysis, University of Adelaide

Abstract

While G08 universities are marketed as research intensive, there has been little opportunity for Bachelor of Social Science students enrolled at the University of Adelaide to receive dedicated research training. Social Research Advanced (SRA) was designed for students to experience and practice the various stages in the research process from design, literature review, ethics, field work, and finally, the writing of the research report. Student response to driving their own research was that it provided a more dynamic, practical and ‘hands on’ approach to understanding and ‘doing’ social research. This “learning by exuberance” (Nygaard, Højl & Hermansen, 2008) finding resonates with other academics from different disciplinary backgrounds who have included student research projects in their teaching (Frishman, 2001; Hequet, 2010; Bernard, 2011).
This paper has three aims. Firstly, to offer background on how the course was conceived as both important training for postgraduate study as well as job-ready skills for graduate employment. Secondly, the paper aims to provide the rationale for and design of SRA, particularly with regard to pedagogical considerations in terms of moving students through an initial state of anxiety to a position where they took ownership of their research. The third aim is to review student responses to the course, which show that while overall student feedback was positive, changes are also required to reduce anxiety and give students more in-class opportunities to practice skills in advance of doing assignments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Badcock, P., Pattison, P., & Harris, K.-L. (2010). Developing generic skills through university study: a study of arts, science and engineering in Australia. Higher Education , 60 (4), 441-458.

Baker, G., & Henson, D. (2010). Promoting employability skills development in a research-intensive university. Education + Training , 52 (1), 62 - 75.

Bernard, W. (2011). What students really think about doing research. The Science Teacher , 78 (8), 52f.

Billson, J. M., & Tiberius, R. (1991). Effective Social Arrangements for Teaching and Learning. New Directions in Teaching and Learning , Spring (45), 87-109.

Billson, J. M., & Tiberius, R. G. (1991). Learning, Effective Social Arrangements forTeaching and Learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning , 45 (Spring).

Brown, K. M. (2004). Leadership for Social Justice and Equity. Weaving a Transformative Framework and Pedagogy. Educational Administration Quarterly , 40 (1), 77-108.

Christopher, R. (2009). A Carpenter’s Daughter. A Working-Class Woman in Higher Education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Curry, J., Alminde, C., Bloom, K., & Cramsie, K. (2008). A Model for Learning Research by Doing Research. Journal of Nursing Administration , 38 (5), 215-218.

De León, L. (2012). Model of Models: Preservice Teachers in a Vygotskian Scaffold. The Educational Forum , 76, 144–157.

Denning, P. (1999). Teaching as a social process. Educom Review , 34 (3), 18-23.

Fairweather, J. S. (1989). Academic Research and Instruction: The Industrial Connection. The Journal of Higher Education , 60 (4), 388-407.

Foskett, R. (2007). Collaborative partnership between HE and employers: a study of workforce development. Journal of Further and Higher Education , 29 (3), 251-264.

Frishman, W. (2001). Student Research Projects and Theses. Should They Be a Requirement for Medical School Graduation? Heart Disease , 3 (3).

Hargreaves, E. (2010). Knowledge Construction and Personal Relationship: Insights About a UK University Mentoring and Coaching Service. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning , 18 (2), 107-120.

Hequet, S. (2010). Moving Student Research into the Community. Teaching Theology and Religion , 13 (4), 372.

Ledwith, M. (2007). On being critical: uniting theory and practice through emancipatory action research. Educational Action Research , 15 (4), 597–611.

ergo, vol. 3, no.2 29

Loertscher, D. (2009). The Front End Load of Student Research. Teacher Librarian , 36 (4), 42-43.

Manathunga, C., & Wissler, R. (2003). Generic Skill Development for Research Higher Degree Students: An Australian Example. International Journal of Instructional Media , 30 (3), 233-246.

Merriam, S. B. (2008). Adult Learning Theory for the Twenty-First Century. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education , 119, 93-98.

Neill, M. A. (2011). Graduate-entry nursing students’ experiences of an accelerated nursing degree. A Literature Review. Nurse Education in Practice , 11, 81-85.

Nygaard, C., Højl, T., & Hermansen, M. (2008). Learning-based curriculum development. Higher Education , 55, 33-50.

Peters, J. M., & Armstrong, J. L. (1998). People labouring together to construct knowledge. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education (79), 75-85.

Plach, S., & Paulson-Conger, M. (2007). Demystifying the Research Process With Participatory Learning. A Taste of Research. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development , 23 (1), 45-48.

Shinners, K. D. (2006). Follow the leader: Project structure and leadership roles in a grant-supported collaboration. International Journal of Educational Management , 20 (3), 206 - 214.

Tabak, I., & Baumgartner, E. (2004). The Teachera s Partner:E xploring Participant Structures, Symmetry and Identity Work in Scaffolding. Cognition and Instruction , 22 (4), 393-429.

Tranter, B. (2010). Sampling. Social Research Methods. Maggie Walter, Editor. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Withall, J. (1975). Teachers as Facilitators of Learning -- A Rationale. Journal of Teacher Education , 26, 261-266.

Yorke, M., & Longden, B. (2008). The first-year experience of Higher Education in the UK. The Higher Education Academy.

Downloads

Published

2014-05-21

Issue

Section

Articles